How ancient wisdom can help managers give their employees better feedback
" It’s more about the person giving the rating than the actual performance of the person being evaluated."
How to Merge Multiple Word Documents in Microsoft Office 2016
Just in case I ever need it...
The Human Side of Trade – Medium
How trade and innovation are similar...
Scheduling 101: Using Calendly for Student Appointments
Worth looking into, though I don't personally have a good use case right now.
Disconnected, fragmented, or united? a trans-disciplinary review of network science | Applied Network Science | Full Text
During decades the study of networks has been divided between the efforts of social scientists and natural scientists, two groups of scholars who often do not see eye to eye. In this review I present an effort to mutually translate the work conducted by scholars from both of these academic fronts hoping to continue to unify what has become a diverging body of literature. I argue that social and natural scientists fail to see eye to eye because they have diverging academic goals. Social scientists focus on explaining how context specific social and economic mechanisms drive the structure of networks and on how networks shape social and economic outcomes. By contrast, natural scientists focus primarily on modeling network characteristics that are independent of context, since their focus is to identify universal characteristics of systems #netlit
